Board Thread:Art, Stories and Songs/@comment-26186871-20151122132251/@comment-26062370-20151122213145

TheFreddyFromThePizzaria wrote:

Mr. Mark Twain wrote:

TheFreddyFromThePizzaria wrote:

Mephistophele wrote:

TheFreddyFromThePizzaria wrote:

Mephistophele wrote: You utter, complete bigot. I pity your mother to have to gone through the pain of birthing you. What a waste.

Yes, you are. Idiot. Nope.. I myself stated we should still be equal, and not above Motionless. But the only ones that aren't male or female are microbes and robots. This DOES include living ones, by being a soul posessing one of them. So Motionless is either a microbe or a robot, by your logic.

Also, your biology is incorrect.

So's your definition of gender. Motionless IS either a robot or a microbe. That's my point.

My guess is a possesed robot, JUST like me. Freddy, I have gone to great lengths to be polite to you, out of my Christian faith.

However, when you call someone that chooses to be gender-neutral a robot, or a microbe - well, sir, you have crossed the line.

I cannot say that I understand or approve of Motionless' choice - but I am Motionless' friend, and I will respect the choice to the greatest extent that I am able.

Now, you have two options -

Actually think for once about what you have said and evaluate what you will say next.

or

You may get out. How is Motionless, or anyone for that matter, supposed to be gender-neutral AND human? Could you evaluate, using logic alone, how that is possible? Though I do suppose Motionless COULD have a gender and doesn't want us to use it.. Yes, I can evaluate it. Biological sex and gender of the mentality are two entirely different things.

No, Motionless themself said to refer to Motionless as 'they'. I suggest you respect the wish.

You truly disgust me.