Board Thread:Art, Stories and Songs/@comment-26186871-20151122132251/@comment-26186871-20151122193237

Or.. That their wiki is just misunderstanding enginerring, and that this could easily be a robot instead, and then scienifically follow the principals of engineering. I'll say that, because that is my principal. The scientific studies aren't wrong, the wiki is just misinterpreting them, saying that these HAVE to be the fragile type, when nope, they're robots!