Board Thread:Art, Stories and Songs/@comment-26186871-20151122132251/@comment-26186871-20151122212518

TheKrazyStew wrote: TheFreddyFromThePizzaria wrote:

TheKrazyStew wrote:

TheFreddyFromThePizzaria wrote: Nope.. I myself stated we should still be equal, and not above Motionless. But the only ones that aren't male or female are microbes and robots. This DOES include living ones, by being a soul posessing one of them. Motionless wants to be referred to as gender neutral. Can you not respect that? It's the whole reason why I used it. Otherwise I'd go using he and she all the time! But to do that, I have to use the only gender-neutral pronoun set:it, and it's. Then how do you explain this?

TheFreddyFromThePizzaria wrote: Motionless IS either a robot or a microbe. That's my point.

My guess is a possesed robot, JUST like me. Motionless is a human that wishes to be referred to as gender-neutral. They aren't a robot or microbe. Well the only way I can refer to Motionless as gender-neutral is to refer to it as something that's not a human, because otherwise, I'd be saying it's NOT genderless!

KrazyStew, are you implying that Motionless is several separate beings? If you're not, then check your grammar. They is plural.